cd33 recombinant ectodomain (Sino Biological)
Structured Review
![Identification of <t>CD33-specific</t> SdAbs (A) CD33 indirect ELISA curves of llama plasma at different stages during immunization (percentage of signal vs. plasma dilution factor [DF]). (B) Output/input (O/I) phage ratio for each panning round. (C) Phage ELISA of the original library and the final output AO3. (D) Preliminary ELISA screening of isolated E. coli clones infected with bacteriophages. As positive control, one positive clone from a previous round output (C+) was offered. (E) Final ELISA screening of isolated E. coli clones expressing the SdAbs from the expression vector pETMod. The positive control (C+) was C4 from the preliminary screening, and the negative control was an irrelevant SdAb-expressing clone culture supernatant from a panning round against another target. (F) Sequence alignment of the five candidate SdAbs selected for further characterization. (G) Phylogenetic tree of the identified SdAb sequences against CD33, clustered into five families based on half distance. (H) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE and anti-HA Western blot of the IMAC and IEC purified SdAbs. (I) Cross reactivity test (ELISA) of the five candidate SdAbs against antigens from the same llama library.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_4528/pmc11904528/pmc11904528__gr1.jpg)
Cd33 Recombinant Ectodomain, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 7 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd33+recombinant+ectodomain/Human+CD33+%2F+Siglec-3+Protein/pmc11904528-165-7-10
Average 93 stars, based on 7 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Discovery and preclinical development of a SdAb-based CAR-T technology for targeting CD33 in AML"
Article Title: Discovery and preclinical development of a SdAb-based CAR-T technology for targeting CD33 in AML
Journal: Molecular Therapy Oncology
doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2025.200949
Figure Legend Snippet: Identification of CD33-specific SdAbs (A) CD33 indirect ELISA curves of llama plasma at different stages during immunization (percentage of signal vs. plasma dilution factor [DF]). (B) Output/input (O/I) phage ratio for each panning round. (C) Phage ELISA of the original library and the final output AO3. (D) Preliminary ELISA screening of isolated E. coli clones infected with bacteriophages. As positive control, one positive clone from a previous round output (C+) was offered. (E) Final ELISA screening of isolated E. coli clones expressing the SdAbs from the expression vector pETMod. The positive control (C+) was C4 from the preliminary screening, and the negative control was an irrelevant SdAb-expressing clone culture supernatant from a panning round against another target. (F) Sequence alignment of the five candidate SdAbs selected for further characterization. (G) Phylogenetic tree of the identified SdAb sequences against CD33, clustered into five families based on half distance. (H) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE and anti-HA Western blot of the IMAC and IEC purified SdAbs. (I) Cross reactivity test (ELISA) of the five candidate SdAbs against antigens from the same llama library.
Techniques Used: Indirect ELISA, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Isolation, Clone Assay, Infection, Positive Control, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Negative Control, Sequencing, Staining, SDS Page, Western Blot, Purification
Figure Legend Snippet: Characterization of SdAbs (A) ELISA sigmoidal curves for each candidate SdAb and the “My96” ScFv as relative A450 vs. log of SdAb concentration (nM). (B) SPR sensorgrams for each SdAb and the reference ScFv from SCK runs, along with their respective fitting curves (χ 2 < 10% Rmax, tc > 100∗Kon, and U < 15) (C) BLI epitope binding curves of the secondary binding of each SdAb, the primary SdAb or ScFv to bind is specified in each graph title. (D) Histograms of anti-HA PE stained MOLM13 CD33+ cells pre-incubated with 1 μg of each SdAb for 1 h, alongside control staining with antiCD33 BV510 (WM53).
Techniques Used: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Binding Assay, Staining, Incubation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: CD33 binding affinity and kinetic constants for the five SdAb candidates and the reference ScFv
Techniques Used: Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Functional characterization of SdAb-CAR-T cells (A) Population doublings during 14 days of CAR-T cell expansion. (B–D) FACS characterization of untransduced T cells (UTD) and CAR-T cells at baseline and after 12–14 days. Repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons (FDR correction) was performed for all compositional analyses. (B) T cell populations (CD8/CD4) and (C) subpopulations (Te: effector, Tem: effector memory, Tcm: central memory, Tscm: stem cell memory, Tn: naive) of CD4 (left) and CD8 (right) T cells. (D) CAR+ % over total T cells. (E) Activation and exhaustion markers of CD4+ CAR-T cells. (F) CAR-T cytotoxicity on three different AML cell lines expressing different levels of CD33 (MFI of stained cells on left panel) evaluated via luciferase activity. (G) Cytokine expression in the supernatant of 1:1 E:T co-cultures: IL2 (left) and IFNγ (right). n = 6 independent healthy donors aged between 18 and 26 years old n = 4 for Nb1 (not included in the first experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with Tukey's multiple comparisons with FDR correction. Results are shown as mean and error bars represent the standard deviation (SD) derived from biological (A–F) or technical (G) replicates. ∗ p < 0.05,∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Activation Assay, Expressing, Staining, Luciferase, Activity Assay, Standard Deviation, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of CD33 targeted SdAb-based CAR-T cells on mouse xenograft AML model (A) Schematic representation of the optimized procedure on NGS mice created with BioRender.com . (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of low-dose (0.5 × 10 6 CAR-T cells/mice), intermediate-dose (1.5 × 10 6 CAR-T cells/mice), and high-dose (3 × 10 6 CAR-T cells/mice) treatments of AML (MOLM13) xenografted mice ( n = 8). For statistical analysis, survival curves were compared using the Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001. (C) In vivo tumoral progression in AML (MOLM13 luciferase+) xenografted mice treated with SdAb/ScFv-based CAR-T cells, and UTD T cells. Top panel: luminescence images of a sample of the treated mice (two males on the left and two females on the right), injected with luciferin at different time points. Bottom panel: progression of MOLM13 cells on each mouse, measured as luciferase activity (Total Flux), and corresponding survival curves, analyzed using the Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Luciferase, Injection, Activity Assay
Related Articles
Recombinant:Article Title: Discovery and preclinical development of a SdAb-based CAR-T technology for targeting CD33 in AML Article Snippet: .. A male llama was immunized with the Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:Article Title: Discovery and preclinical development of a SdAb-based CAR-T technology for targeting CD33 in AML Article Snippet: .. A male llama was immunized with the Clinical Proteomics:Article Title: Discovery and preclinical development of a SdAb-based CAR-T technology for targeting CD33 in AML Article Snippet: .. A male llama was immunized with the |
